- From: Dave Peterson <davep@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 15:43:31 -0500
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
At 12:56 PM 1/30/97, lee@sq.com wrote: >There are two <P> elements here that are not closed. This is not well formed. >It is not valid SGML either, unless SERVER has a CDATA content model or >unless < is no longer MDO :-) MDO is normally "<!"; I presume you mean STAGO. But then the real markup wouldn't be right. So let's conclude that the spurious "<P>"s should have been protected. That's why we've made < automatically available, isn't it? Dave Peterson SGMLWorks! davep@acm.org
Received on Thursday, 30 January 1997 15:45:55 UTC