- From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 15:02:34 -0500
- To: tallen@fsc.fujitsu.com
- CC: tallen@fsc.fujitsu.com, w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
>| >How may TEI extended pointers be expressed as URLs? >| >| We've already shown some different possible syntaxes... >| one with TEI pointers as fragment specifiers and the other >| with the pointer as part of the URL itself (David >| and I had a length debate about these recently!!). > >I think one and only one syntax should be chosen (preferrably by >the TEI folks rather than the SERB). I think both *type* have a place. Fragment ID's can be used for client-side sub-document addressing, and URL addressing can used to identify objects at a finer granularity than entities/documents. They could share a common syntax, I agree.
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 1997 15:04:25 UTC