W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > October 1996

Re: B.10 Empty elements?

From: <lee@sq.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 96 11:47:12 EDT
Message-Id: <9610251547.AA20976@sqrex.sq.com>
To: jjc@jclark.com, mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com
Cc: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
> >How does an SGML system impose this constraint?
> It doesn't, but it doesn't matter to an SGML parser since it must have the
> DTD.

Doesn't anyone here use SGML editors?
How is your unmodified SGML editor going to deal with this?
Both Adept and A/E understand NET when they read SGML, and both products
will normalise and write out SGML with no NET tags.

My <@e> suggestion (adding @ as a UCNMSTRT or LCNMSTRT character) will
at least let you create XML files with existing SGML tools.
Although if the \< suggestion is adopted, RS/RE changed, and there is
no DTD, and there are processing instructions at the start that tell
you the character set, I expect you'll need a conversion program anyway.

Received on Friday, 25 October 1996 11:47:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:04 UTC