- From: Charles F. Goldfarb <Charles@SGMLsource.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 03:36:45 GMT
- To: Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.UIC.EDU>
- Cc: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, 12 Oct 96 15:09:33 CDT, Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU> wrote: >On 16 October 1996, the ERB will vote to decide the following question. >A straw poll indicates the question needs further discussion in the work >group. > >B.10 What form should EMPTY elements take, if there are EMPTY elements >in XML: <e>, <e/, or <e></e> (where '/' is assumed the NET string) >(7.3, 11.2.3)? > <e></e> requires no changes to the SGML declaration. The DTD will need to contain (have I got this right, Michael) an "elephant's child" content model instead of the declared content EMPTY, but that won't break any SGML tools at all. -- Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553 13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management --
Received on Thursday, 24 October 1996 23:36:33 UTC