- From: Charles F. Goldfarb <Charles@SGMLsource.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 03:36:49 GMT
- To: Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.UIC.EDU>
- Cc: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 22 Oct 96 08:25:14 CDT, Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.UIC.EDU>
wrote:
>[Medium-long note. Executive summary: the discussion of 'implicit'
>DTDs has served its purpose and can be ended without damage to
>the process of designing and documenting XML 1.0.]
O.K. It is now clear that in XML a document "without a DTD" means literally
that, and not just "parsable without reference to its DTD". I think this is
unfortunate because I believe it will render XML a non-starter in the
marketplace.
I hope someone can prove me wrong by rebutting the following proposition (formal
mathematical proof not required):
XML without a DTD is no different from HTML extended by the ability to "add tags
and attributes" just by defining processing for the additions in a style sheet
(cascading or otherwise).
--
Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553
13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA
International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime
Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management
--
Received on Thursday, 24 October 1996 23:36:32 UTC