- From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 15:13:10 -0400
- To: tbray@textuality.com
- CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
>lightweight and easy to adopt? At the same time, James is correct that it >is unreasonable and wrong to expect render-mostly network browsers to use >the SGML transclude-and-parse semantics. Is there an option-free way to >reconcile our goals? Assuming that we do not have asynchronous nodes, can't the transclude-parse model be replaced by parser-transclude-parse? Validation would complicate it somewhat, but not overly much.
Received on Thursday, 24 October 1996 15:14:46 UTC