W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > October 1996

Re: ERB decisions on A.17, B.9, and other questions

From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 18:18:23 -0400
Message-Id: <199610232218.SAA03342@nathaniel.ebt>
To: jjc@jclark.com
CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
>Why can't you build your mechanism using normal elements
><!ENTITY foo '<glyph unicode="XXX" glyphid="XXXX" charid="XXXX"/>'>
>?  I don't find the argument that "my DTD may not have a glyph element" very 
>convincing: most SGML DTDs are certainly going to need modifying to
>support XML.  

You *could* do this, but it is semantically incorrect in my books. It
is also a less interoperable solution (all systems would know that
SDATA was something special, but not all would necessarily know that
<glyph> was to be replaced by characters). Also, the *requirement* of
DTD changes/additional is not one to be ignored either.
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 1996 18:20:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:04 UTC