- From: Len Bullard <cbullard@HiWAAY.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 22:53:09 -0500
- To: John_Lavagnino@brown.edu
- CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
John_Lavagnino@brown.edu wrote: > > | C.14 Should XML allow more than one enumerated type (name-group > | declared value) to contain the same possible value (11.3.3)? > > The enumerated type strikes me as an easy-to-use construct that helps > make the act of validation look useful to people; it's natural to use > it in a lot of situations, and the only thing that has been a big > problem with it in SGML is this prohibition against reusing the > values. > > John Lavagnino Also agree. This restriction is the first thing programmers and DTD designers find that fails the stoopid test (yes | no). Change this, please. len
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 1996 23:52:50 UTC