- From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 18:21:31 -0400
- To: alb@kirk.mit.edu
- CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org, alb@ebt-inc.ebt.com
>to 10646. Thus I belive that it is higlhly important that XML >includes SDATA entities and in a way that is decoupled from 10646. >Use of "private use" areas in 10646 I believe will lead to the same >mess as eg IBM ended up with EBCDIC. Agreed. >At the recent SGML Asia Pacific conference it was very interesting to >hear the complaints from "CJK" representatives on 10646. If you feel it is negative now, imagine a few years ago. At least now I get a more positive feeling from Japanese factions that were rabidly against it a few years ago.
Received on Monday, 21 October 1996 18:23:20 UTC