Re: C.2 prescribed implementation of ENTITY-END signal?

• From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
• Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 00:54:50 -0400
• To: U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU
• CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <199610180454.AAA13215@nathaniel.ebt>

>C.2 should XML prescribe the use of an ENTITY-END character as the
>canonical method of handling entity boundaries, as a way of
>simplifying exposition and implementation (6.2.2)?

As ENTITY-END is not really a character (like the infamous RE/RS
pair) I'd lean to leaving this out.

Received on Friday, 18 October 1996 00:56:27 UTC