- From: David G. Durand <dgd@cs.bu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 22:53:54 -0400
- To: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
At 1:23 PM 10/17/96, Michael Sperberg-McQueen wrote: >On 23 October 1996, the ERB will vote to decide the following >question. A straw poll indicates the ERB is leaning to yes. > >C.11 Should XML retain SGML's prohibition on multiple attribute-list >declarations for the same element (11.3.1) or on multiple >declarations for the same attribute (11.3.2)? 11.3.1 no. I still think that this simple mechanical DTD transform would be staggeringly useful. 11.3.2 yes. I can't even tell what 2 delcarations for one attribute would mean. I wish that I could declare one model for an attribute on one element and a different model for the same attribute on another element, but the language surgery would be too intense even for me to advocate it in XML. -- David RE delenda est. _________________________________________ David Durand dgd@cs.bu.edu \ david@dynamicDiagrams.com Boston University Computer Science \ Sr. Analyst http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/ \ Dynamic Diagrams --------------------------------------------\ http://dynamicDiagrams.com/ MAPA: mapping for the WWW \__________________________ http://www.dynamicdiagrams.com/services_map_main.html
Received on Thursday, 17 October 1996 22:49:27 UTC