W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > October 1996

Re: B.10 Empty elements?

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 12:28:11 -0700
Message-Id: <3.0b33.32.19961014122757.00b2b6b4@pop.intergate.bc.ca>
To: "Eve L. Maler" <elm@arbortext.com>, lee@sq.com, U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU, w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 01:39 PM 10/13/96 -0400, Eve L. Maler wrote:

>(2)  provide the necessary markup declarations in a "partial DTD" so that
>     empty elements can be understood:
>
>     <!ELEMENT e - O EMPTY><!--or whatever-->
>
>(2b) provide the necessary "instance parameters" rather than whole markup
>     declarations (which generally provide more info than is needed for
>     read-only processing functions):
>
>     <?XML empty e><!--or whatever-->

Sign me up with Eve on (2) - this has the advantages that it's easy
to explain, easy to parse, and is consistent with both SGML and HTML
thinking.  

2b - please, not another syntax for doing the same thing... whether we
use DSD or DTD, let's use one thing throughout.  The difficulty of parsing
(2) as opposed to (2b) is nowhere near greater enough to justify getting
into another syntax.


Cheers, Tim Bray
tbray@textuality.com http://www.textuality.com/ +1-604-488-1167
Received on Monday, 14 October 1996 15:29:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:04 UTC