- From: Charles F. Goldfarb <Charles@SGMLsource.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 15:58:07 GMT
- To: bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM (Jon Bosak)
- Cc: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org, bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM
On Sat, 12 Oct 1996 21:08:49 -0700, bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM (Jon Bosak) wrote: >Guarantee that all end tags contain the GI, and you enable incredibly >powerful operations to be performed on arbitrarily large collections >of documents from a single Korn shell command line. Take away that >guarantee, and suddenly you have to maintain a stack. I don't disagree with requiring all end-tags to contain the element type name. However, you'll still have to maintain a stack because, for example, OLs can nest in LIs, so you can't simply scan for the next </OL> to match a given <OL>. -- Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553 13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management --
Received on Sunday, 13 October 1996 11:59:19 UTC