- From: Charles F. Goldfarb <Charles@SGMLsource.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 07:50:04 GMT
- To: Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU>
- Cc: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, 12 Oct 96 15:10:12 CDT, Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU> wrote: >On 16 October 1996, the ERB will vote to decide the following question. >A straw poll indicates the question needs further discussion in the work >group. > >B.12 Should XML retain SGML's prohibition on multiple declarations for >the same notation (11.4)? I thought the ERB had decided not to augment SGML. Why is this question even being asked? -- Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553 13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management --
Received on Sunday, 13 October 1996 03:51:54 UTC