- From: Bill Smith <bill.smith@Eng.Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 09:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
David Durand wrote: > If we drop the distinction, we must treat spaces and tabs as data elements > in element content (like tables) because without a DTD we can't tell > whether or not it is element content, and therefore "insignificant". Of > course, I'd say that we should drop it, and accept the restrictions on > whitespace, but the current leaning reflects the "code-formatting" needs > you and others have advocated. I don't think David is suggesting requiring a DTD. I'm firmly opposed to requiring a DTD, even a short form, to "properly" handle XML. If we cross the DTD/DTDless line, I think we will significantly reduce the liklihood that XML will be adopted. We should drop the distinction.
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 1996 12:21:47 UTC