- From: Bill Smith <bill.smith@Eng.Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 8 Oct 1996 10:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
This is a resend of aposting that went into the void. ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: A4: XML's use of SHORTTAG? Cc: Message-Id: <libSDtMail.9610041613.5651.bsmith@providence> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-MD5: w8gPnwlF9Y5yYroFSMh0ZQ== > > The final point, on omitted attribute-value specifications, raises the > general question of how XML systems will behave when no DTD, or a > partial DTD, is provided -- if such omitted or partial DTDs are allowed. > It also raises the question of providing a way for a document to signal > that its DTD can be skipped without loss of information (e.g. because it > has no default attribute values, or no empty elements, etc.). These > questions are to be discussed and decided separately. > I would argue that we not allow default attributes, etc. in the first version of XML. Allowing default attribute values demands that we require a DTD or some DTD subset for all documents that make use of this shorthand notation. Unfortunately, this places a burden on all XML client developers of parsing and interpreting DTDs - correctly. A server-side mechanism can be employed to transform SGML document instances that employ default attribute values to an XML equivalent. Subsequent versions of XML could allow default attribute values, etc. ------------- End Forwarded Message -------------
Received on Tuesday, 8 October 1996 13:29:07 UTC