- From: Lou Burnard <lou@vax.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 07 Oct 1996 19:01:48 +0100
- To: W3C-SGML-WG@w3.org
- CC: lou@vax.ox.ac.uk
I haven't been able to pay as much attention to this list as I should (pressure of real life intervening) and I must say that such of it as I have read has been often been rather remote from my interests (eg jesuitical distinctions between varieties of spaces between words)... *howsomever* I would like to go on record as enthusiastically endorsing Preposition 28 -- that the same syntax be used both for expressing and for defining XML document structure. I think Tim's arguments in favour are both cogent and expedient. This would be a decision that would make entirely clear what it is that XML has which distinguishes it from both SGML and from HTML, at the same time as showing that it has the strengths of both. Lou
Received on Monday, 7 October 1996 14:02:12 UTC