- From: Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 03 Oct 96 17:01:52 CDT
- To: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
The period of open unstructured discussion in the WG is coming to an end (reminder: the voting booth closes soon; if you haven't voted or wish to revise your votes, do so now!), and on 9 October, the ERB will begin voting on specific questions regarding the technical content of the XML specification. Our current plan is to vote on questions in batches: one batch each on 9, 16, 23, and 30 October. Each week, we will announce what questions we expect to vote on at the next week's meeting, so that members of the work group can make their views known on questions important to them. On behalf of the ERB, I am about to send out a series of email messages with the items to be decided next Wednesday, one item per message, to make it easier to follow individual threads. As will be clear, some of these are relatively non-controversial, at least as far as the ERB can tell, while others need (further) discussion to clarify the pros and cons of the issue. If the ERB is described as leaning a particular way on an item, and you agree, there is probably no need for comment; if you disagree, a note giving the arguments in favor of the opposing view is in order. When the ERB does not have a clear leaning, we need full discussion of all sides of the question. It should be noted in advance that not all of the questions are perfectly independent of each other; the ERB is acutely aware that some later decisions may require us to revisit earlier decisions, to ensure consistency of the final result. Thanks, and my apologies in advance for the avalanche of messages which will follow this one by a few minutes. -C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Received on Thursday, 3 October 1996 18:19:05 UTC