- From: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 16:00:34 -0800
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
This is a very brief summary report on XML activities at SGML 96 for the benefit of WG members who were not able to attend. ---------- WG MEETING ---------- A meeting of the W3C SGML WG was held on Sunday, November 17, the evening before the conference. The meeting gave those who attended a chance to see each other in person and to exchange views on the progress of the XML effort. Printed copies of the XML 1.0 draft of 961114 were distributed, and two questions were put to the members assembled: 1. Should we proceed in two further phases as we have been saying we would, or should we rather (a) proceed with both in parallel or (b) switch the order to address stylesheets first and linking second? Option (a) found little support in its strong form (that we create a subgroup for each activity), but the discussion made clear that some linking and some stylesheet functions would both have to be demonstrable by the April WWW conference. After thinking about (b) for a while, it was generally accepted that linking is more critical than stylesheets, so on paper at least, we are still saying that Phase II is basically about linking (though "linking" here has to include the ability to link to a stylesheet). 2. Bearing in mind that we need to limit WG participation to qualified people, should we invite more participants? Here the sentiment was clearly in favor of expanding the WG, but only by invitation. Current members of the WG can recommend persons known to them to have SGML expertise for inclusion in the WG, but there will be no general announcement or call for participants. Recommendations of persons to be considered for WG membership must be made to me directly by existing WG members. ----------- XML ROLLOUT ----------- The XML 1.0 draft was officially presented to a standing-room-only crowd during the second morning session of the technical track on Tuesday, November 19. Tommie Usdin chaired the session. Tim Bray eloquently presented the rationale for SGML simplification. Jon Bosak explained the organization of the WG and ERB and introduced the ERB members to the audience (nine of the eleven ERB members were in attendance on stage). Michael Sperberg-McQueen led the audience through the specification, noting which features of 8879 had been retained or dropped and explaining the new XML concept of "well formedness". James Clark briefly described the implications of XML for implementors. Tim Bray returned to give his recommendations for vendors, and Jon Bosak finished with recommendations for content providers. Questions following the presentations focused mainly on clarifications of technical points, especially the concept of well-formedness, and implicit requests for reassurance that we were not eliminating the concept of validation. The political backlash that some of us had feared simply did not materialize. --------- AFTERMATH --------- Since the XML rollout occurred fairly early in the conference, there were another two days to assess the impact of the announcement plus an additional day of SGML Open vendor feedback. While it is clear that not everyone in the SGML community is entirely happy with the draft specification, the general response was overwhelmingly positive. As we had hoped, the majority of SGML experts saw XML as a way to bring more people into the world of structure and open standards, while the beginners welcomed a subset that was obviously easier to learn than the full standard. Vendors were quick to see the marketing opportunities presented by XML, and most were claiming some form of support before the conference was over. One of the most gratifying and hopeful developments of the conference was the willingness expressed by leaders of the SGML revision effort to cooperate with us in further improving the XML specification by working quickly to approve a Technical Corrigendum to 8879 that would help us resolve some of the SGML compatibility issues that have given us the most trouble in defining the specification. This spirit of cooperation will make it possible to productively revisit at least three issues that have created the most unhappiness both in the WG and the ERB -- overlapping attribute values, white space handling, and ambiguous content models. The warm reception accorded XML by the SGML community and the positive participation of WG8 leadership in forming the best possible specification make me very optimistic that we can produce an attractive new technology in time for the WWW6 conference in April. Jon
Received on Friday, 22 November 1996 19:02:48 UTC