- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 18:49:17 +0100
- To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>, Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 11:45 04/05/04 +0100, McBride, Brian wrote: >Can I take it your are now done? Has the RFC been published yet, in which >case can I have a reference for the WG home page. Er, unfortunately not. When I said "... things go quiet for a while" I wasn't clear that the "while" may be weeks or months. The RFC editor's queue is a long-stay venue. #g -- > > -----Original Message----- > > From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org > > [mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Graham Klyne > > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 10:01 AM > > To: Aaron Swartz > > Cc: RDF core WG > > Subject: Fwd: Document Action: 'application/rdf+xml Media > > Type Registration' to Informational RFC > > > > > > Aaron, > > > > This is the formal announcement. > > > > I would suggest forwarding a copy (or URI) of your XML source code to > > <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> (with a copy of or clear > > reference to this > > announcement, or at least to the approved Internet Draft > > name). According > > to [1][2], the RFC Editor can use this to ease internal > > publishing process. > > > > What will probably happen now is that things go quiet for a > > while, then you > > will receive an email from the RFC Editor giving you 48 hours > > to review the > > document edited to its expected final form as an RFC. > > Sometimes, errors do > > creep in during the RFC Editor process, so it's worth > > checking, though with > > a simple document like this I don't anticipate problems. > > > > The RFC editor maintains a publicly visible queue at [3]. > > > > Thanks for your prompt turnaround over the past few weeks. > > > > #g > > -- > > > > [1] > > http://xml.resource.org/pipermail/xml2rfc/2003-November/000957.html > > > > [2] > > http://xml.resource.org/pipermail/xml2rfc/2003-September/000794.html > > > > [3] http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html > > > > > > >From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> > > >To: IETF-Announce:; > > >Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, > > > RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> > > >Subject: Document Action: 'application/rdf+xml Media Type > > > Registration' to Informational RFC > > >Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:22:43 -0400 > > >Sender: ietf-announce-admin@ietf.org > > > > > >The IESG has approved the following document: > > > > > >- 'application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration ' > > > <draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-05.txt> as an > > Informational RFC > > > > > >This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the > > product of an > > >IETF Working Group. > > > > > >The IESG contact person is Scott Hollenbeck. > > > > > >Technical Summary > > > > > >This document describes a media type (application/rdf+xml) for use > > >with the XML serialization of the Resource Description Framework > > >(RDF). RDF is a language designed to support the Semantic Web, by > > >facilitating resource description and data exchange on the Web. RDF > > >provides common structures that can be used for interoperable data > > >exchange and follows the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) design > > >principles of interoperability, evolution, and decentralization. > > > > > >Working Group Summary > > > > > >The document has been reviewed by the W3C RDFcore working > > group, which > > >has reached consensus on the request to publish this document. The > > >document was also presented for review on the IETF-types list; no > > >comments were received. > > > > > >Protocol Quality > > > > > >Scott Hollenbeck has reviewed the spec for the IESG. He has > > confirmed > > >that there are multiple producers of data served as > > application/rdf+xml. > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >IETF-Announce mailing list > > >IETF-Announce@ietf.org > > >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > > > > ------------ > > Graham Klyne > > For email: > > http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact > > ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 05:46:28 UTC