- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:04:38 +0000
- To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 08:22 15/01/04 -0600, Aaron Swartz wrote: >>(Aaron: I understand that the RFC editor accepts XML2RFC source >>documents. Could you let us have/point us at a copy of this so we can >>forward it at the appropriate point.) > >This must be a recent innovation. The latest XML draft is at >http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype -02.xml Aaron, thanks. Er, I think you mean: http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-03.xml The "recent innovation" is not (as I understand it) an official policy, and may be relatively recent, but what I take to be a recognition on the RFC editors' part that XML2RFC saves them work in putting the document into nroff format (see [1]). Marshall Rose has put a fair amount of effort into making the XML2RFC output compliant with their editorial policy. (Now, if we had a version that would generate W3C pubrules-compliant HTML ;-) #g -- [1] http://lists.xml.resource.org/pipermail/xml2rfc/2003-November/000957.html ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Friday, 16 January 2004 04:05:28 UTC