- From: Brian McBride <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:27:19 -0000
- To: "Rdf Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: "Brian Archive McBride" <bwm@0-imap-1.hpl.hp.com>
Time: 10:00:00 Fri Jan 15 2004 in America/New York duration 60 minutes which is equivalent to 15:00:00 Fri Jan 15 2004 in Europe/London Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332 irc: irc.w3.org port 6665 #rdfcore 1: scribe - volunteer needed Please could the minutes conform to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0216.html 2: Roll Call regrets: Graham 3: Review Agenda 4: Next telecon 17 Oct 2003 1000 Boston Time Volunteer Scribe 5: Minutes of 12 Dec 2003 telecon See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Dec/0015.html 6: Confirm status of completed actions 2003-12-05#1 bwm to review that the changes to primer 2003-12-05 are ok 2003-12-05#2 daveb make the syntax changes recorded in minutes 2003-12-05 2003-12-05#3 daveb make the N-Triples document quotes change. 7: Approving minutes of this meeting Given that there may be significant gaps between telecons in future, the chair proposes to approve the minutes of telecons by email. Draft minutes will be circulated by email as normal. A chair will call for review of the minutes. The minutes will be approved subject to positive review and no objections being sent within three days of publication of the draft. 8: AC Review Status 9: Proposed minor Changes to Primer Document I interpret Frank as proposing: PROPOSAL: The RDFCore WG recommends to the director that the minor editorial fixes described in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2004Jan/0029.html should be included in the version of the RDFCore Primer which is published as a rec. The PR document with the fixes applied can be found at: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-primer-20030117/ md5: b52ef70329d35310c92e51454167e076 This references an updated figure: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-primer-20030117/vehicleClassesJa n12.png md5: 51a880f6d04c60561bef948c473c54e0 An htmldiff between the PR version and the updated version can be found at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/0040.html 10: Proposed Expository Changes to the Semantics document I interpret Pat as proposing: PROPOSAL: The RDFCore recommends to the director that expository improvements should be made to the RDF semantics document before it is published as a rec. An updated version of the PR document can be found at: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ md5 2dcd2292776e8274b6e8b288dd7022fb [[Pat this is the ed-be version you prefer - would be good to confirm I uploaded it correctly]] An htmldiff between this version and the PR document can be found at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/0053.html [The checksum difference is caused by updating the CVS revision number within the doc as a diff will verify] 11: Review of TAG's Web Architecture Document Jan and Graham have agreed to review on behalf of the WG. Graham reports he has started his review. Jan? Can we agree a date for completion of the review? 12: Mime-types doc: Propose action Graham to investigate most effective means to publish. Graham has indicated willingness to accept such an action: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2004Jan/0051.html 13: Docs at end of RDF and RDFS schema URIs Status? Plans? 14: TechPlenary Update 15: Other things that need doing? RDF Schema for XSD datatypes? RDFCore? BPWG? After Hours Topic: Advice to CG on postponed issues.
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2004 10:30:27 UTC