Re: RDF semantics explosion

pat hayes wrote:

[...]

> 
> There are two versions of it. This one
> 
> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_2004bb.html#defDinterp

Diff from PR version @ 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/0052.html
> 
> is in my view the clearest exposition.  On the other hand
> 
> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_2004bc.html#defDinterp

Diff from PR version @ 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/0053.html
> 
> makes the fewest changes to the PR text so may be preferable for 
> logistical reasons. This only adds the extra vocabulary condition, 
> nothing else.
> 
> Apart from typo corrections,

A quick scan revealed changes in sections 1.4, 2.1, 5.1, Appendix A, 
RDFS entailment lemma, Appendix B and the change log in both versions.

Brian

Received on Thursday, 15 January 2004 05:58:47 UTC