W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2004

RE: revising the semantics PR document

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:37:18 +0100
To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "pat hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>, "Herman ter Horst" <herman.ter.horst@philips.com>, "Eric Miller" <em@w3.org>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: "rdf core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

I will review this once Pat indicates this is the change he is proposing.
I suggest we should also ask for feedback from Horrocks and Patel-Schneider
(OWL Semantics Editor), cc-ing webont.
[Herman does not speak for webont - in particular I note that at the last
webont call he was in a minority on a different semantics issue - nothing
wrong with that of course. It is conceivable that RDF Core might upset
WebOnt by doing what Herman says]

I am happy to raise this informally on webont, as part of my review.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: 08 January 2004 18:03
> To: Dan Connolly; pat hayes; Herman ter Horst; Eric Miller; Jeremy
> Carroll; Sandro Hawke
> Cc: rdf core
> Subject: revising the semantics PR document
> It looks like we need to make some minor revisions to the semantics doc.
>     DanC has asked for a WG decision to approve the change.
> Eric, Sandro, will a decision at a telecon on 16 Jan 2004 be timely from
> your point of view?
> I think what we need is a clear description of the proposed changes for
> review.  Pat, I see a proposal from you at:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004JanMar/th
> read.html
> Have you and Herman agreed to this?  I see Graham has reviewed it and is
> happy with it.
> If anyone has issues with approving this change, please raise them asap.
> Brian
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2004 12:37:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:27 UTC