- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:33:12 -0600
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 11:08, Brian McBride wrote: > Hmm, > > I was just wondering that myself. > > I see the following possible agenda items for a telecon: > > a) wording changes to the semantics doc > b) advice to the CG about what to do about postponed issues > > Dan, would you like the WG to meet to discuss/approve the proposed > wording changes? yes. > Will the 16th be soon enough? Good question, but I haven't done the relevant calendar research to figure it out. EricM, I leave that to you. Call/page me if you'd like help. > Eric, is the CG seeking input from the WG about b). > > WG, do folks want to meet to discuss a), b) or anything else? > > I will send a formal notification of a telecon for 16th Jan, but will > cancel if its not needed. > > Dan, I hope you have fun on Friday. Likewise. 1/2 ;-) > Brian > > > > > Dan Connolly wrote: > > > I've got an opportunity to do some fun family > > stuff this Friday, so I'd like to know whether > > it conflicts with an RDF Core telcon. > > > > I haven't seen notice, and we're less than 7 > > days away, so I presume there's no WG telcon this > > week. Sorry if I missed an announcement to that > > effect. > > > > If the WG meets, I suppose it'll be somewhat unofficially. > > In that case, I offer regrets. > > > > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2004 12:33:14 UTC