- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:10:30 +0100
- To: me@aaronsw.com, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
cf http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2004JanMar/0003 I note that Mark's msg http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0344 seemed to suggest that he would like a postponed issue: [[ Can we at least agree that this is an issue; that RDF Schema isn't self-descriptive? I'm not detecting that you agree. ]] and particularly he is likely to be happier even with an issue postponed until after the "media types as URIs" problem is fixed. I don't suppose we have one do we? I vaguely remember agreeing that mime types were inappropriate for carrying the intended inference, but it may well make sense to review this later if there are media type changes coming down the pipeline. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 5 January 2004 12:15:05 UTC