- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:12:26 -0000
- To: "Graham Klyne" <gk@ninebynine.org>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Thanks Graham. Please can we have a second reviewer. Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Graham Klyne > Sent: 02 February 2004 10:44 > To: Brian McBride; RDF Core > Subject: Re: Draft minutes of RDFCore telecon 20030130 > > > > These minutes posted record the meeting as I recall it, modulo > Mike Dean's > attendance. > > #g > -- > > At 17:03 30/01/04 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: > > >Agenda: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2004Jan/0095.html > > > >Transcript: > > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/30-rdfcore-irc > > > >swebscrape:N3:python: > >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/scripts/minutes2n3.py > >date: 2004-01-30 > > > >1: scribe - volunteer needed > > > >bwm selected by Zakim. > > > >2: Roll Call > >regrets: Jeremy, PatH, DanC, JanG > >present: FrankM, DanBri, bwm, Janet (part time), EMiller, DaveB, > >GrahamKlyne > > > >3: Review Agenda > >skipped > > > >4: Testimonial Orientation && > >5: Press Release Input and Request for Reviewers > > > >Janet congratulated RDFCore on gettng the docs ready. Subject to the > >director's decision, the plan is hold a joint announcement with WEBONT on > >Feb 10 2004 under the banner of reaching a major milestone in the > >development of the semantic web. > > > >Testimonials are an important part of the announcement. Janet > presented the > >material in: > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2004Jan/0089.html > > > >as guidance for those preparing a testimonial. Details can be > found in the > >irc log > > > > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/30-rdfcore-irc > > > >Also: > > > >A key message is that the semantic web is real, not just theoretical, so > >folks are strongly encouraged to include real examples of how > the semantic > >web is being used in their testimonials. > > > >There will be separate sheets of testimonials for RDF and OWL. A single > >testimonial relevant to both can be put on both, or an organisation can > >prepare separate testimonials for each. > > > >Please send all communications to both the PR team and cc Eric Miller. > > > >There should shortly be a draft of the W3C press release so > folks understand > >the context in which the testimonial will appear. > > > >Testimonials have not be sought from the membership in general, > though that > >will be done shortly. Eric has been actively soliciting support > from folks > >working on RDF but not on the WG. > > > >An example testimonial sheet can be found at > >http://www.w3.org/2004/01/ccpp-testimonial and others can be found under > >http://www.w3.org/Press/. > > > >If some organizations wish to make their own press release, W3C welcomes > >that, but requests: > > > > - the W3C has 24 hours to check that W3C is accurately > represented in the > >release > > - that accompanying releases are sent at least 15 minutes after the > >scheduled W3C release which is 10am Eastern time, 10 Feb 2004. > > - folks may be asked to delay if there are problems, e.g. in > publishing > >the docs > > > >W3C places no restrictions on who from an organisation signs a > testimonial, > >but recommends that someone whose name is familiar to the trade > press does > >so. > > > >Any questions should be sent to the W3T PR list and cc'd to Eric Miller. > > > >6: Next telecon > > > >To allow a telecon before 10 Feb, > > > >Resolved: Next telecon 13 Feb 2004 1000 Boston Time > > > >7: Rec Docs sanity check > > > >There is editorial work to do to publish the docs as recs. > > > >ERIC HAS WRITE LOCK ON ALL THE EDITORS DRAFTS > > > >A number of editorial changes have been made or in progress of > being made, > >including: > > > > - style sheets updated to REC stylesheet > > - big yellow warning box about status > > - copyright updated to 2004 > > - links to errata and translations added > > - doc status updated > > - references updated > > > >Eric requests doc editors to verify changes to doc references. The links > >should go to the shadow TR docs, the ammended text should be checked. > > > >ACTION: danbri review schema > >ACTION: daveb review syntax > >ACTION: daveb review test cases > >ACTION: frank review primer > >ACTION: gk review concepts > >ACTION: em review model theory > >ACTION: em use judgement to update IANA reference appropriately > > > >The WG is aware we are not updating LBase at this time. > > > >8: Mime type registration > > > >Discussion over whether to hold off until rec. > > > >RESOLVED to delay mimetype registration till after the documents > reach REC. > > > >ACTION: gk inform Aaron. > > > >9: TAG Architecture Doc review > > > >No discussion. > > > >AOB: > > > >Please review the draft agenda for the SW interest group meeting > at the Tech > >Plenary > > > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2004Jan/0188.html > > > >Meeting Adjourned. > > > >After adjournment, Danbri mentioned that he had updated the docs > at the RDF > >and RDFS namespaces. > > ------------ > Graham Klyne > For email: > http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact >
Received on Monday, 2 February 2004 06:14:51 UTC