W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2003

I18N response draft2 - and possible concessions

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:57:21 +0300
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200309261157.21229.jjc@hpl.hp.com>

Completing my action ... it is attached.

I added discussion of the merging plain and XMLLiterals proposal, and also 
mentioned the two proposals to do with reflecting xml:lang in triples, 
although I avoided discussing them in detail, since a discussion of tidiness 
seemed out of place. This may be appropriate to discuss at the telecon.

Comments on other aspects by e-mail or at the telecon.

Note there are a few to dos which I call out here:

@@ add link to dissent, when it comes @@

@@ to be completed @@ We have received further comment concerning this aspect 
of our design as reflected in the 5th September 2003 Working Drafts: 
@@ from webont
@@ any other

(I anticipate at least a comment from webont, but it has not happened yet).

The Working Group did accept an @@what concession do we make - add 'at risk' 
part, add exit criteria@@ 


On the last point here are some possible concessions:

1) Add to syntax, on the rdf:parseType="Literal" cosntruction

A parser MAY warn if there is an inscope non-empty xml:lang.

2) Add to syntax, in the bit about generating RDF/XML

When generating rdf:parseType="Literal", you SHOULD generate xml:lang="".

3) Add to our PR entrance criteria the following

At least one RDF API that provides uniform access to language identifiers in 
plain and XMLLiterals.


Received on Friday, 26 September 2003 05:58:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:25 UTC