- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:21:21 +0300
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
JosD: > I still LOVE that design and along interpretationproperties > I eg can't find anything wrong with the lang issue variation > _:b eg:name _:c. > _:c lang:fi "Ora Yrjö Uolevi Lassila". Me neither, but *this* design would be out of order because it does not address the I18N concern. In particular what triples arise from <rdf:Derscription xml:lang="fi"> <dc:creator rdf:parseType="Literal"> Ora Yrjö Uolevi <b>Lassila</b> </dc:creator> </rdf:Description> The interpretation property is either the datatype or the language but not both. (I am not saying that's wrong, but given that the only reason for reopening the design issue at this stage would be if we could really address the I18N issue then this design is not right) Jeremy
Received on Friday, 19 September 2003 05:21:23 UTC