- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:34:23 -0600
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 08:38, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > I propose that we reject the comments in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0120.html > > with headings > > - Treatment of language information for XML Literals: > - XML Literals as typed literals Per my action ACTION 2003-11-07#8 I sent a reply along those lines. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0164.html after elaborating on our decision rationale using input from you, Jeremy... http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure v 1.217 2003/11/12 22:58:21 The issues list can still be tweaked if you think I've left something important out. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 18:34:24 UTC