Re: Proposal to reject I18N XMLLiteral comments

On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 08:38, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> I propose that we reject the comments in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0120.html
> 
> with headings
> 
> - Treatment of language information for XML Literals:
> - XML Literals as typed literals

Per my action ACTION 2003-11-07#8 I sent a reply along
those lines.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0164.html

after elaborating on our decision rationale using input from you,
Jeremy...

http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure
v 1.217 2003/11/12 22:58:21

The issues list can still be tweaked if you think I've left something
important out.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 18:34:24 UTC