- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 19:23:16 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Jos De_Roo wrote: > > Jan - that all sounds very fine to me, and I'm looking > forward to the new version asap. > > Have a nice weekend! > > > -- > Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ > > PS that list suggestion is actually like what we translate > the manifest into namely http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/etc1.n3 As an additional datapoint, Sandro has just made an additional comment to the -comments list that (independently of this discussion) suggests adopting an rdf:List format. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0133.html Although he doesn't mention it explicitly, the same comments apply to the manifest format for declaring datatype support. Looking for guidance from the WG here (and in particular from JJC since he's the WebOnt test case editor). Cheers, -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ stty intr ^m
Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 14:24:28 UTC