Process for editorial fixes? Re: Missing test:entailmentRules arcs (fwd)

Incidentally, should I be making editorial fixes to a particular copy of
the document now?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:53:26 +0000 (GMT)
From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Subject: Re: Missing test:entailmentRules arcs

Sandro, thank-you for your comments, and for taking the time to run the
test cases.

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Sandro Hawke wrote:

> The following entailment tests are not really defined (and dont work
> in my test harness), since they have no entailmentRules data:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest.rdf#test008
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest.rdf#test009

The intention is that in the absence of other entailmentRules, simple
entailment is used. I note that that condition is missing from the test
case document through editorial oversight; my proposed fix is to add the
text,

[[
In the case that no test:entailmentRules elements are present, the rules
of simple entailment as specified in [RDF-SEMANTICS] are used.
]]


> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test007a
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test007b
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test007c

Again, these tests demonstrate the distinction between language-tagged
and non-language-tagged plain literals, and should be viewed as simple
entailments.


With the addition of the above editoral fix to the test case document,
would your concerns here be addressed?


-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
Unfortunately, I have a very good idea how fast my keys are moving.

Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 05:59:08 UTC