Re: RDFCore teleconference: 2003-10-31

[...]

> > There is also some concern that the claim of two implementations
passing
> > each test case is not sufficiently sunstantiated.  Maybe the evidence
is
> > there is properly presented?
> >
> > DaveB, please look at test case work by Jeremy and Jos, and determine
> > if this is easily put into a form in which it can be checked/presented
> > using the OWL test case software.
>
> A while back I ran the tests and the results are at
> http://www.agfa.com/w3c/temp/rdf-result.rdf
> (I still haven't found a way to *pass* the negative
> entailment tests)

Actually we don't pass the negative entailment tests
but we also don't fail any of them, so that's better
than it was before...

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Sunday, 2 November 2003 12:23:52 UTC