- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 14:29:21 +0200
- To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.example.org/a"> > > <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;int">3</eg:prop> > > </rdf:Description> > > > > Does not entail > > Does not RDF or RDFS entail, but *does* datatype entail, right? > > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.example.org/a"> > > <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;int"> 3 </eg:prop> > > </rdf:Description> > > No it doesn't entail at all. " 3 " is not an integer but "3" is. So the second graph is not a consequence of the first, because the whitespace makes a difference. (I frankly haven't a clue what the second graph means - I promised Brian I would read the semantics editors draft before the telecon, so I might know by then). Jeremy
Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 08:40:50 UTC