- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 14:17:43 +0300
- To: <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com] > Sent: 09 May, 2003 13:23 > To: Jeremy Carroll; w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: RE: xmlsch-02 whitespace facet discussion > > > > > > I think we could go in either of two directions: > > > > A: accept the comment > > "worried that it may not be > > obvious that the whitespace processing is not part of > the process of > > checking lexical forms for type validity," and add test cases to > > demonstrate that whitespace is significant even inside > typed literals of > > types which in a XML Schema context would get processed > away (such as the > > integer examples) > > > > > > PROPOSE RDF Core accepts the comment xmlsch-02 and agree to add the > following test case: > > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.example.org/a"> > <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;int">3</eg:prop> > </rdf:Description> > > Does not entail Does not RDF or RDFS entail, but *does* datatype entail, right? > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.example.org/a"> > <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;int"> 3 </eg:prop> > </rdf:Description> > > Moreover the following comment to be added to concepts: > > [[ > NOTE: In [XML Schema (part 1)], white space normalization occurs > during validation according to the value of the whiteSpace > facet. The lexical-to-value mapping used in RDF datatyping > occurs after this, so that the whiteSpace facet has no > effect in RDF datatyping. > ]] Good. Patrick
Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 07:17:47 UTC