- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 19:11:10 +0100 (BST)
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time: 10:00:00 Fri May 11 2003 in America/New York duration 120 minutes which is equivalent to 15:00:00 Fri May 11 2003 in Europe/London Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332 irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore 1: scribe: Jeremy Carroll A co-chair requests scribe reviews http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0216.html so that the script can extract the actions list. Suggest use date format: date:2003-05-11 2: Roll Call Regrets: FrankM, PatrickS 3: Review Agenda 4: Next telecon 16 May 2003 1000 Boston Time Last One before WWW 2003 Volunteer Scribe 5: Minutes of 02 May 2003 telecon See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0031.html 6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 2003-03-14#6 gk review semantics editor ACTION: 20030425#5 danc figure out the cost to WebOnt of accepting timbl-03 see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0040.html ACTION: 20030502#1 bwm send the comments in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0002.html as comments from RDFCore on OWL Reference LCWD see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0004.html ACTION: 20030502#2 jang send revised OWL S+AS 2.3.2.1 words to the rdfcore list see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0074.html ACTION: 20030502#3 gk review 4.1 of AS&S especially the translation to triples table, with an eye on implementation. see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0045.html ACTION: 20030502#4 jang split s+as comments in 0291 into editorial substantial issues, with issue ids see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0074.html ACTION: 20030502#5 jjc explain point about use of (restrictions on use of )blank nodes in OWL DL, Lite and propose a comment for OWL see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0070.html ACTION: 20030502#7 bwm Remind webont co-chairs about timbl-03 issue ACTION: 20030502#8 eric put timbl-03 issue on the agenda for next SWCG see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-semweb-cg/2003May/0002.html ACTION: 20030502#9 bwm add danc-04 to postponed issues list see: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-fyi ACTION: 20030502#14 bwm allocate a formal comment ID for the rdfs:Schema issue see: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#eikon-01 ACTION: 20030502#17 jjc make a proposal to the list to treat XMLLiteral like any other datatype see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0016.html 7: RDFCore comments on OWL AS+S 20030502#2 jang send revised OWL S+AS 2.3.2.1 words to the rdfcore list http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0074.html 20030502#3 gk review 4.1 of AS+S especially the translation to triples table, with an eye on implementation. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0045.html 20030502#4 jang split s+as comments in 0291 into editorial substantial issues, with issue ids http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0074.html 20030502#5 jjc explain point about use of (restrictions on use of )blank nodes in OWL DL, Lite and propose a comment for OWL http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0070.html See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0291.html 8: Status on Incoming Last Call Comments 2003-03-28#9 jjc update Concepts in light of XML Schema LC review editorial comments 2003-03-28#11 danbri check for editorial actions on Schema from XML Schema LC review 9: Issue xmlsch-07 datatype definition http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#xmlsch-07 Formal proposal to not accept this comment as it has been withdrawn by the xml schema group: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0316.html 10: Issue tex-01 According to the IRC log: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2003-04-04#T16-21-39 we resolved tex-01 on the 4th April but this was not recorded in the IRC log. Therefore propose, as was previously agreed and not recorded: - classify tex-01 as a clarification - add the following note to concepts: [[ Note: The case normalization of language tags is part of the description of the abstract syntax, and implicitly the abstract behaviour of RDF applications. It is not intended to constrain an RDF implementation to actually normalize the case. Crucially, the result of comparing two language tags should not be sensitive to the case of the original input. ]] - add the following test cases [[ <rdf:Description> <eg:prop xml:lang="en-us">a</eg:prop> </rdf:Description> entails <rdf:Description> <eg:prop xml:lang="EN-us">a</eg:prop> </rdf:Description> entails <rdf:Description> <eg:prop xml:lang="en-US">a</eg:prop> </rdf:Description> ]] JJC please update/correct as necessary. 11: Issue timbl-03 We had a couple of proposals: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0262.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0280.html But could not agree. Decided to investigate cost to WEBONT of changing: 20030425#5 danc figure out the cost to WebOnt of accepting timbl-03 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0040.html too high. Others disagree - its a small change PatH http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0058.html JJC http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0066.html However, jjc favours keeping the type triples because its better for Owl DL to require type triples everywhere, than have special cases where they are needed in some places and not in others. 12: Language tags in typed literals At last weeks telecon a straw poll indicated we were of a mind that having lang tags in the abstract syntax of typed literals was a mistake. After some discussion on the list Jeremy has offered two options for removing them: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0071.html A co-chair would like us to be clear about the advantages/effects of these changes. 13: Issue xmlsch-01 Typed Literal Structure Various proposals to close: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0247.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0252.html 14: Issue xmlsch-02 Whitespace facets Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0224.html 15: Semantics Issues We have several semantics issues: horst-01 pfps-01 pfps-03 pfps-05 pfps-09 That I suspect we are ready to close, but we need a formal motion to close them. ------------------------------------------------------------ This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant, running on Jena 2
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2003 14:11:27 UTC