- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:03:44 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Jeremy, Remembering DanC's advice from a short time ago, the point of last call is identify issues that folks can't live with. If you are going to propose even discussion of a *huge* change, perhaps you might care to suggest why a huge change is necessary. Brian At 11:19 27/03/2003 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >Williams-02 is the suggestion that we should: >- defer to Namespaces 1.1 for the definition of IRI >- and globally substitute "[RDF] URI Reference" by "IRI" > >There is a small substantive differences which is Unicode Normal Form C. >On the advice of I18N WG in Cannes we required RDF URI References to be in >Unicode NFC; Martin Dürst informs me that they have changed their minds on >this one. > >Draft proposal: > >Change concepts to defer to Namespaces 1.1 defn of IRI rather than have a >definition of RDF URI reference. > >Globally substitute "[RDF] URI Reference", "uriref" etc. by "IRI". > > >This needs discussion! > >Also, we should e-mail i18n-ig and ask for an official comment from the wg >retracting their advice in Cannes. > >Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2003 06:02:39 UTC