- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 13:01:12 +0200
- To: "Jeremy Carroll <jjc" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
> possible AOB - approval of tex-01 and xmlsch-02 test cases > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/tex-01/ > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/xmlsch-02/ > > (Brian also note that the agenda from concepts are, I hope, each very short, > and I would not be surprised if we reach AOB fairly easily) In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0143.html I wrote [[ I've checked/foundOK http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/xmlsch-02/Manifest.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/tex-01/Manifest.rdf ]] Also w.r.t. to the test case document I believe that I already mentioned that http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest.rdf#language-and-xml-literal is now a PET (PositiveEntailmentTest) according to our resolution that Language tags *don't* affect the denotation of an rdf:XMLLiteral Other than that, I haven't found other test case document issues. -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ PS I expect to attend todays telecon (but still have 2 meetings to go) and I regret for next week friday as I have a whole day meeting in Munich.
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 07:01:22 UTC