W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2003

Re: xmlsch-02 whitespace test cases

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 00:00:57 +0200
To: "Jeremy Carroll <jjc" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFC52CA2F9.BFEDC3B9-ONC1256D24.0078B81C-C1256D24.0078F2AC@agfa.be>

I've checked/foundOK

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

                    Jeremy Carroll                                                                                      
                    <jjc@hpl.hp.com>          To:     w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org                                             
                    Sent by:                  cc:                                                                       
                    w3c-rdfcore-wg-requ       Subject:     xmlsch-02 whitespace test cases                              
                    2003-05-12 09:21 PM                                                                                 

I have added the test cases that I think we were discussing to the test
as proposed tests.

These are in


test001.rdf Shows the well-formed literal
29:   <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.example.org/a">
30:     <eg:prop rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int"
31:   </rdf:Description>

test002.rdf Shows the ill-formed literal
29:   <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.example.org/a">
30:     <eg:prop rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int"
          > 3 </eg:prop>
31:   </rdf:Description>

test003.rdf Is the was this a literal bnode.
30:   <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.example.org/a">
31:     <eg:prop>
32:         <rdfs:Literal/>
33:     </eg:prop>
34:   </rdf:Description>

The Manifest declares 4 tests:

test001 does not entails test002
test002 does not entail test001
test001 entails test003
test002 does not entail test003

I haven't added the datatype supports statements to the manifest because I
don't understand those. I guess all four should show xsd:int as required
datatype, and the last two need rdfs.

I am not sure how well, or not, these fit with Jos's results.

Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 18:01:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:22 UTC