- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:07:36 +0300
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Also I give the HP proxy to Brian just in case there is a CR/PR vote. My current preference is PR, but I am clearly not sufficiently in touch with an "HP" position, given Dave Reynolds implementation report which seemed to me at least to be more negative, i.e. so far http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0076 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jul/0278 we have no complete RDFS implementation (in terms of inference) This may be reason to go for a CR, possibly labelling those bits that are not yet implemented as at risk. e.g. two of our RDFS implementors do not appear to buy into an infinity of axiomatic triples ... e.g. maybe we made the wrong call on the xmlsch-02 ... Jeremy
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 05:08:00 UTC