W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2003

RE: Request for clarification on Canonical XML

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:33:44 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>, John Boyer <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>
Cc: "w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, "w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org" <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "Peter F. \\ Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

At 20:57 03/07/24 -0400, Rich Salz wrote:
>I would like it to be made VERY EXPLICIT that this is non-normative
>advice for those intending to use xml-c14n for something other than its
>originally intended purpose.  If the text was more than a paragraph -- or
>if it's possible to add more, so it becomes more than a paragraph -- I'd
>even rather see it as a separate W3C note.
>And, by the way, shouldn't we all be using exc-c14n instead of c14n
>whenever possible?

The request actually came from exc-c14n. But that one relies on c14n
for that particular aspect of its definition.

Regards,    Martin.
Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 16:22:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:24 UTC