- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:26:23 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: >>** Failures - could fix: >>NegativeEntailmentTest xmlsch-02/Manifest.rdf#whitespace-facet-2 - FAIL >>NegativeEntailmentTest xmlsch-02/Manifest.rdf#whitespace-facet-1 - FAIL >> These test non-mutual entailment of a valid literal with an invalid >> literal that differs only by whitespace. Unfortunately our XSD >> handling library is happy with the whitespace and doesn't >> treat " 3 " as an invalid int. >> This could be fixed if that is indeed how XSD is supposed to work, >> though the current behaviour seems more useful in practice. >> > > Would somebody please turn that into a question of clarification > for the XML Schema folks? Hmmm xmlsch-02 was raised by XML Schema folks to check that we had understood where the whitespace handling happens. It appears that the Xerces implementors (who Dave defers to) do it different from in the spec. (Probably more usefully) > > > >>** Failure - will fix: >>PositiveEntailmentTest datatypes/Manifest.rdf#language-and-xml-literal - FAIL >> This is the xml:lang on xml:Literals issue. To be fixed. >> >>** Pass: >> > [...] > > Jeremy
Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 14:27:32 UTC