W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Re: pfps-04

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 24 Jul 2003 15:53:39 +0100
To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1059058419.2327.106.camel@dhcp-91-136.hpl.hp.com>

On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 23:03, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:


> Therefore for the RDF entailment rules to be complete, no XML Literal can
> have a character string as its denotation.

Right.  The denotation of an XML Literal is an octet sequence, as
defined by the xml canonicalization spec, see the note in:


Pat, does this suggest deleting from section 3

This terminology is deliberately agnostic as to whether or not XML data
is considered to be identical to a character string; note however that
the XML data values corresponding to well-typed XML literals are in
precise 1:1 correspondence with the XML literal strings of such

The statement you make is correct, in that the terminology is agnostic,
but its also unnecessary and maybe a little misleading.

Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 10:54:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:24 UTC