- From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 02:18:35 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>I have done these four actions, as per the telecon minutes: > >I18N interest: >JJC add warning to Concepts 3.4 to use XML if markup required > >more boring: >JJC apply pfps-22/23 changes as agreed last week >JJC remove normative references to RDFS URI >JJC remove references to term "RDF core" in Concepts >(mainly impacting section 4) > > >Editors draft URI: >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/ > > >Graham, please review section 4, and if the overall text looks OK give peter a >heads up to see if he is less unhappy. > >The text I have added to 3.4 is a normal paragraph at the end of the section >which reads: >[[ >For natural language text that may require markup, the use of typed literals >with type rdf:XMLLiteral is suitable. In such cases, a language tag, if >required, must be The 'if required must be' seems odd: it seems to insist without insisting, if you see what I mean. Suggest rewording perhaps as follows: "in such cases, if a language tag is required it must be" >explicitly included within the markup, usually as the value >of a xml:lang or lang attribute, possibly on a span or div element, >additional to the principal content [XHTML]. >]] > >The informative reference to XHTML is new. > >Jeremy -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2003 03:18:39 UTC