- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:15:21 -0400
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, i18n <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
Brian-- Perhaps I shouldn't have said "test case" (since I haven't checked the Test Cases document), and I don't know what the status of the files is/are. I'm referring to the files "example09.rdf" and "example09.nt" referred to in the title of Example 9 in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030117/ (these are the same as in the LC WD as far as I can tell). --Frank Brian McBride wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 16:27, Frank Manola wrote: > > Martin-- > > > > Thanks. As I said in my original message, this is a related issue > > then. That is, you may think that the XML namespace information > > *should* be carried over into the XML literal, per your response to my > > question #3, but if you look at the Test Case associated with Example 9 > > of the Syntax specification, example09.rdf (the RDF/XML) has the "a" > > namespace declaration, but that namespace declaration does not appear in > > the XML literal generated as the object of the corresponding output RDF > > triple (example09.nt). > > Is that an old test case not updated since the post last call change to > xml literals? > > Brian -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2003 14:15:35 UTC