Re: Proposal

On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 16:27, Frank Manola wrote:
> Martin--
> 
> Thanks.  As I said in my original message, this is a related issue
> then.  That is, you may think that the XML namespace information
> *should* be carried over into the XML literal, per your response to my
> question #3, but if you look at the Test Case associated with Example 9
> of the Syntax specification, example09.rdf (the RDF/XML) has the "a"
> namespace declaration, but that namespace declaration does not appear in
> the XML literal generated as the object of the corresponding output RDF
> triple (example09.nt).

Is that an old test case not updated since the post last call change to
xml literals?

Brian

Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2003 12:35:10 UTC