- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 20:52:17 +0100
- To: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Cc: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 17:57 08/07/03 +0100, Misha Wolf wrote: >Graham Klyne wrote: > > > (Hmmm... general W3C process point: > > given I18N is regarded as so fundamental, I think the purpose would > > be better served by having I18N *participation* from the beginning, > > or at the beginning, not occasional reviews later in the process.) > >In the beginning was the RDF M&S spec. And lo and behold, there was >I18N participation. Yes, I wondered about that. The problem is, little of the rationale from that earlier involvement got communicated to the later WG (as far as I'm aware). IETF specs often have a section titled "Internationalization considerations" ... maybe something similar might have helped here? Just a thought. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2003 03:42:06 UTC