W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Re: Post-last-call comments on N-Triples notation

From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 23:11:05 -0500
Message-Id: <p0600120fbb280b8ed15d@[]>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>  >
>>  The question came up from a team member whether there was a
>>  difference between N-Triples and N3. It was pointed out that
>>  a quite probable way to read "N3" is as 'n-triple'
>I've just asked half a dozen people to pronounce 'N3'; people unfamiliar
>with SW.  They called it "n-three".  I asked several of them if they
>might have said "n-triples" (out of earshot of the others) and the
>general response was "don't be silly".
>The participants were all brits except one american.  could be a
>cultural thing I suppose.
>This wasn't exactly a well designed human factors experiment - but I
>found no evidence of confusion.
>>   (rather than
>>  as 'n-three'). It was suggested that choosing a different name
>>  than N-Triple would avoid (or would have avoided) such kinds
>>  of confusion.
>Changing a name can also cause confusion.  I've seen no evidence to date
>of the present name causing confusion, nor is there anything in your
>comment beyond speculation that it might.  N-triples has been so named
>for quite a while now with no complaint.  Weighing the non-zero cost of
>changing it together with the possibility of the change creating the
>very problem that it seeks to avoid against the evidence that a real
>problem exists, I think its unlikely that the WG will want to take this
>comment any further.
>Say now if this is not acceptable.
>>  Personal comment: Both of the above comments seem to at least
>>                     point to the need for a strong warning
>>                     "Warning: N-Triples in not N3".
>http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#ntriples begins:
>N-Triples is a line-based, plain text format for encoding an RDF graph.
>It was designed to be a fixed subset of N3
>Is that sufficient?

Attempting to pronounce "NNN" might be the best way to express my 
views of this thread.


IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2003 00:11:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:23 UTC