W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2003

Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-01-17

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:39:29 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: fmanola@mitre.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 07:45 17/01/2003 -0500, Frank Manola wrote:


>I don't wish to unnecessarily raise process issues, but as I read
>Section 5.2.2 of the process document, where point number two says that
>one of the entrance criteria is:
>"formally address all issues raised by Working Group participants, other
>Working Groups, the Membership, and the public about the Working Draft"
>I don't believe Primer technically meets this criterion (assuming I'm
>interpreting it properly), since I have not yet responded to PPS's Dec.
>27 set of comments about the Primer LCC.  I'm in the process of
>composing a response, but the comments were rather extensive, and I
>haven't completely decided what to say I'm going to do about all of them
>yet.  Sorry if this creates a complication.

I suggest we take process advice from the W3C folks at the telcon.

In your judgement as editor, are any of Peter's comments critical?  For 
non-critical comments, what we have done on the other docs is to say thanks 
for the comments, these are editorial and we will fix them during the last 
call process.  I've explained to Peter this our strategy offlist.

Received on Friday, 17 January 2003 08:38:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:20 UTC