- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:29:21 +0000
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Gentlemen, We are scheduled to take a last call vote Friday. This, I think is our current status. - syntax: required changes applied - concepts: required changes applied - test cases: required changes applied? - primer: reviews in and no critical issues - schema: reviews in and required changes proposed http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0066.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0068.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0078.html - semantics: reviews in and critical issues addressed Graham and Jan's issues are fixed in the current version. Reading Peter's latest post, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0091.html [[Actually, it might be OK, but only because of the wording outside of the conditions that the extra conditions are ``on all datatypes other than the built-in datatype''. This wording is cryptic in the extreme. There also needs to be some clarification here as to whether datatypes are members of the domain or URI references.]] my interpretation is that there may be some further clarification needed, but that can be done during last call. - LBase has been ready to go for a while It would be helpful if the schema reviewers could indicate by email that the proposed changes are acceptable and deal with their issues. Brian
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2003 12:29:16 UTC